I guess I should not be shocked that ignorant people are ignorant. Given the amount of distortion in the Danish press, I should not be surprised that Danes have a pretty fucked up idea of what happened in the Oliver kidnapping case . Given that, I have heard some straight up nonsense about the case that not even the newspapers have printed.
Here are some freelance distortions/lies I have heard about the kidnapping of Oliver:-
“His Dad was only picking him up from kindergarten!” – BEFORE kindergarten started in the morning, as his mother was dropping him off. And his mother had to be held back by a strange man for this “picking up” to happen. If you have to sugar coat what happened, you must agree that what happened was completely out of order. Otherwise, why wouldn’t one say “He had a friend hold the mother down while he took the child from the car before kindergarten started”? It is what happened without any verbal twisting, why does it need to be made more pretty if what he did was acceptable?
“His Mum abducted him from Denmark! His Mum broke the law!” – She had full custody of the boy when she left. The Danish state are very happy to issue international arrest warrants for parents who have taken their children out of Denmark unlawfully. The reason they did not in this case, is that she had not broken the law. That is NOT abduction. The father was free to visit his child and he did not for six months. He has always been free to move to Austria to be close to his child.
“The Danish state found in the father’s favour!” – True. Six months after the child had left Denmark. But the Austrian state found in the mother’s favour. Why is it only the Danish court that counts? The Danish court is being investigated by the EU and other courts of human rights for favouring Danes above ALL considerations. If you have a parent who sexually abuses their child and a parent who doesn’t; they pick whichever one is Danish. I would not trust those shits as far as I could throw them.
By taking the child by force, he showed how unfit he is to parent. Who does that to a child? The Danish state are colluding with this abuse by refusing to honour international arrest warrants. It reminds me of when a little girl refused to go home with her Dad because he was going to abuse her. He called the cops and they FORCED her to go home with him. The Danish media are colluding by publishing biased accounts.
Reading German language news is very revealing, the Danish media are giving quite a one-sided account. Denmark could give a fuck less about the needs of children. It is all about making sure the tribe is satisfied.
All he wants to do is control and punish his ex and all the people lining up behind him in support are helping him. Their support is why he knew he could do it and get away with it. They are all culpable, as much as that man who held the mother back while she screamed and screamed.
What will happen now is that the Danish state will claim that it’s not in the child’s interests to move “now” because it has “gone on too long”. Where the two years in Austria were not long enough, evidently, to settle down. That the violence of his abduction isn’t “bad enough” to preclude him from having full custody. Because the child is “fine”.
- Custody (adventuresandjapes.wordpress.com)
- News Translation: I feared kidnapping (adventuresandjapes.wordpress.com)
- Austrian News: Father will escape (“Mr Sørensen was there when the report that said his son would be traumatised by kidnapping was written. It’s black and white, whatever the Danish psychologists will end up saying.”)
- Austrian News: It wasn’t a kidnapping (“she was screaming because she was surprised to see me”)
- Austrian News: In Denmark, it’s all strange (“She had custody when she left in 2010.”)